4.8 Article

A Series of Mixed-Metal Germanium Iodates as Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Materials

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 2443-2452

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00630

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91622112, 21701173]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB20000000]
  3. 100 Talents Project of Fujian Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of new compounds in the A/Ae-Ge4+-IO3 system, namely, A(2)Ge(IO3 )(6) (A = Li, Na, Rb, or Cs) and BaGe(IO3)(6)(H2O), have been obtained by introducing GeO6 octahedra into a ternary metal iodate system. The structures of all five new compounds feature a zero-dimensional [Ge(IO3)(6)](2-) anion composed of a GeO6 octahedron connecting with six IO3 groups, the alkali or alkali-earth cations acting as spacers between these anions and maintaining charge balance. Interestingly, the isomeric Li2Ge(IO3)(6) and Na2Ge(IO3)(6) are noncentrosymmetric (NCS), whereas the isostructural Rb2Ge(IO3) 6 and Cs2Ge(IO3)(6) are centrosymmetric. BaGe(IO3)(6) (H2O) is the first NCS alkali-earth germanium iodate reported. Powder second-harmonic generation (SHG) measurements show that Li2Ge(IO3)(6) , Na2Ge(IO3)(6) , and BaGe(IO3)(6) (H2O) crystals are phase-matchable and display very large SHG signals that are approximately 32, 15, and 12 times that of KH2PO4 , respectively, under 1064 nm radiation and 2, 0.8, and 0.8 times that of KTiOPO4 , respectively, under 2.05 mm laser radiation. The compounds show high thermal stability and a large laser damage threshold, indicating their potential applications as nonlinear optical (NLO) materials in visible and infrared spectral regions. Measurement of optical properties, thermal analysis, and theoretical calculations of the SHG origin have been performed. Our studies indicate that introducing non-second-order Jahn-Teller-distortive MO6 octahedra into metal iodate systems can also lead to good mixed-metal iodate NLO materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据