4.8 Article

Triptycene-Based Porous Metal-Assisted Salphen Organic Frameworks: Influence of the Metal Ions on Formation and Gas Sorption

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 2781-2790

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00614

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous organic polymers (POPs) are chemically and thermally robust materials and have been often investigated for their gas sorption properties. From the related field of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) it is known that open ligation sites at metal centers can enhance the performance of gas sorption significantly, especially the selectivity toward one gas of a binary mixture, such as CO2/N-2 or CO2/CH4. POPs that contain metal centers are rarer. One possibility to introduce metals into POPs is by the synthesis of metal-assisted salphen organic frameworks (MaSOFs), where the framework development is associated with the formation of the metal salphen pockets. Based on a hexakissalicylaldehyde, a variety of three-dimensional isostructural porous MaSOFs with different metal ions (Zn2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Pd2+, and Pt2+) are introduced. All compounds show a very similar pore structure and comparable specific surface areas, which make these MaSOFs ideal candidates to study the influence of the nature of the incorporated metal center on gas sorption selectivity. Due to the environmental importance, the adsorption of CO2 in comparison to N-2 and CH4 was extensively studied. Depending on the metal ions, the heat of adsorption was different as well as the Henry and IAST selectivities. Cu-MaSOF(100) for instance shows a high Q(st), of 31.2 kJ mol(-1) for CO2 and an uptake of 14.9 wt % at 1 bar and 273 K. The LAST selectivity of CO2/N-2 for an 80/20 mixture is with S-IAST = 52 very high for a metal containing POP and even comparable to some of the best performing MOFs. The MaSOFs are stable even in boiling water. This, as well as the simple synthesis, makes them potential good candidates for CO2 removal of binary mixtures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据