4.4 Article

Analysis of Multiple β-Agonist and β-Blocker Residues in Porcine Muscle Using Improved QuEChERS Method and UHPLC-LTQ Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry

期刊

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 915-924

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-015-0238-z

关键词

beta-Agonist; beta-Blocker; QuEChERS; Porcine muscle; UHPLC; LTQ Orbitrap XL

资金

  1. AQSIQ industrial public service scientific research project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of P. R. China [201210029]
  2. AQSIQ industrial public service scientific research project of P. R. China [201310143]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of General Administration of AQSIQ of China [2014IK107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the present study is to develop and optimize a simple, high-throughput method for determining 14 beta-agonists (i.e., banbuterol, brombuterol, cimaterol, cimbuterol, clenbuterol, clenpeterol, clorpenaline, isoxsuprine, mabuterol, mapenterol, ractopamine, salbutamol, terbutaline, and tulobuterol) and two beta-blockers (propranolol and penbutolol) in porcine muscle. The samples were pretreated by a modified quick, easy, cheap, efficient, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method, and analysis was carried out in a reversed phase HSS T3 C18 column using gradients of acetonitrile and 5 mmol L-1 ammonium acetate (0.1 % formic acid) solution for elution. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-LTQ Orbitrap MS, resolution 60,000) was used for qualification and quantification of the 16 target compounds. Under optimized conditions, the limits of detection and quantification obtained ranged from 0.17 to 1.67 mu g kg(-1) and from 0.56 to 5.00 mu g kg(-1), respectively. Recoveries for spiking levels of 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 mu g kg(-1) ranged from 62.4 to 121.9 %, from 60.4 to 104.3 %, and from 66.5 to 121.3 %, respectively. The relative standard deviations obtained were lower than 20 % for all spiking levels assayed. The proposed method was applied successfully in sample analysis, and satisfactory results were obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据