4.8 Review

Shedding light on tau protein aggregation: the progress in developing highly selective fluorophores

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 47, 期 7, 页码 2249-2265

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00706j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2017R1A2A2A05069805]
  2. Ministry of Science and ICT (CRI project) [2009-0081566]
  3. Basic Science Research Program - Ministry of Education [NRF-2017R1D1A1B03032561]
  4. Korea Research Fellowship Program - Ministry of Science and ICT through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2016H1D3A1938052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Historically, in Alzheimer's disease research, a lot of attention has been paid to the development of highly selective fluorophores for beta amyloid plaques. With a shift in the understanding of the disease and the importance of a network of cross-talk interactions, the development of small-molecule fluorescent dyes with high selectivity for (hyperphosphorylated) tau protein aggregates in neurofibrillary tangles has been gaining increasing attention. Fluorescent dyes for the selective labelling of tau aggregates in histological AD brain sections have been described, spanning the entire visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum. Despite the relatively early stages of the development of the field, a large diversity in probe architectures has been reported. Importantly, a handful of near-infrared-emissive dyes have been described as well, and some of these have exhibited good pharmacological profiles, with a significant blood-brain-barrier permeability, and a demonstrated ability to label tau tangles in vivo in small-animal models of Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies. The developments summarized in the current work are expected to aid the unravelling of the diverse set of players in the etiology of Alzheimer's disease. In this tutorial review, we seek to provide the reader with an overview of the most important recent developments and hope to provide some guidelines for the design of future probes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据