4.7 Article

Wollastonite carbonation in water-bearing supercritical CO2: Effects of water saturation conditions, temperature, and pressure

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 483, 期 -, 页码 239-246

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.012

关键词

Wollastonite dissolution; Silicate; Carbonation; CO2 sequestration; Water-saturated supercritical CO2

资金

  1. National Science Foundation's CAREER Award [EAR-1057117]
  2. Washington University's Consortium for Clean Coal Utilization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The carbonation of silicates in water-bearing supercritical CO2 (scCO(2)) can affect the performance of CO2-enhanced subsurface operation. This study investigated the effects of water, temperature, and pressure on the carbonation of wollastonite (CaSiO3) in water-bearing scCO(2) at 35-93 degrees C, 25-125 bar, and from dry conditions to 140 times more water than needed for saturation (140 x S-w). The extent of reaction increased with more water, higher pressure, and interestingly, lower temperature. In addition, for the first time, we report on water-bearing scCO(2)-silicate reactions for samples with varying prior histories of water saturation conditions, temperature, and pressure. For a sample initially reacted at 100% water saturation (1 x S-w) and then with 45 x S-w, the final reaction extent was smaller than the sample reacted only with 45 x S-w. Similarly, for a sample initially reacted at 60 degrees C and then at 35 degrees C, the reaction extent was smaller than for a sample reacted only at 35 degrees C. In contrast, for a sample initially reacted at 50 bar and then at 100 bar, the reaction extent was the same as for a sample reacted only at 100 bar. The amorphous silica layers formed on the particle surfaces are more permeable with more water and lower temperature, and are not affected by pressure. These findings provide new insights into the extent to which water-bearing scCO(2)-silicates reactions depend on environmental conditions and the reactions' impacts on subsurface CO2 injection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据