4.6 Article

A multiscale CFD-PBM coupled model for the kinetics and liquid-liquid dispersion behavior in a suspension polymerization stirred tank

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 1-17

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.11.045

关键词

CFD-PBM coupled model; Suspension polymerization; Liquid-liquid two phase; Polymerization kinetic characteristics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1462101, 21625603]
  2. Center for High Performance Computing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Suspension polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) has been considered as a liquid-liquid reactive polydispersity system, which involves the complex multiphase flow behavior at multiple time and length scales. The polymerization kinetic characteristics (i.e., gel effect and glass effect) and liquid-liquid dispersion phenomena (i.e., breakage and coalescence of liquid droplets) appearing in this process make the study of suspension polymerization complicate. In this work, a three dimensional (3D) multiscale model including Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid model, polymerization kinetics model, population balance model (PBM) and some other constitutive models was developed to elaborate those multiscale phenomena in polymerization course. The current model was validated using the reported data in terms of conversion, molecular weight as well as droplet Sauter diameter. The developed model was then employed to investigate the influence of key operating conditions on polymerization kinetic characteristics and liquid-liquid dispersion phenomena. Furthermore, the effects of reactor structure on droplet breakage and coalescence were studied in detail. This simulation work may contribute to the preparation of polymer products and the scaling up of stirred tank polymerization reactors with multiphase flow and multiscale characteristics. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据