4.6 Article

Performance of agitated-vessel U tube heat exchanger using spiky twisted tapes and water based metallic nanofluids

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 26-39

出版社

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.02.030

关键词

Agitated-vessel U tube heat exchanger; Spiky twisted tapes; Water based metallic nanofluids; Experimental study

资金

  1. Islamic Azad University (IAU) Shahrood Branch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental study is performed to investigate hydrothermal characteristics of agitated vessel U tube heat exchanger. In order to augment the rate of heat transfer in the tube side, two passive enhancement techniques, namely spiky twisted tapes and water based metallic nanofluids, are used. Three twist ratios (alpha = 0.33, 0.67, and 1) with different values of width/depth for peripheral cuts (beta = 0.33, 0.5, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, and 3) and three metallic nanofluids (Cu/water, Fe/water, and Ag/water) are tested. The experiments are done in turbulent flow regime for Reynolds numbers ranging from 7000 to 18,000. The Reynolds number is determined based on hydraulic dimeter of considered geometries as well as inlet flow rate and physical properties of applied working fluid. The results show that spiky twisted tapes and metallic nanofluids both realize great heat transfer enhancement in the agitated-vessel U tube heat exchanger. Utilization of spiky twisted tapes leads to an increase in the range of 11%-67% for the heat transfer coefficient compared with the smooth case. The considered performance factor displays that the most efficient configuration is the spiky twisted tape with alpha = beta = 0. 3 3. Also, it is found that the heat transfer enhancement of Ag/water nanofluid is more intensive than Cu/water and Fe/water nanofluids; a maximum enhancement by 18.2% is identified compared with base fluid, while the maximum rise in the pressure drop is only 8.5%. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据