4.7 Article

Post-endogenous denitrification and phosphorus removal in an alternating anaerobic/oxic/anoxic (AOA) system treating low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) domestic wastewater

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 339, 期 -, 页码 450-458

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.096

关键词

Post-endogenous denitrification; PHA; Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification; Denitrifying GAOs; Post-EDPR; AOA process

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51578014]
  2. Projects of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education
  3. 111 Project [D16003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel post-endogenous denitrification and phosphorus removal (post-EDPR) system was developed by enriching denitrifying glycogen accumulating organisms (DGAOs) and phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAOs) to treat low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) wastewater (C/N = 4.4). The unique feature of the post-EDPR system was the continuous alternating anaerobic/oxic/anoxic zone (3.1 h/3.9 h/7 h) with suspended biofilm carriers in oxic zone. The 132-day test results showed that extended anaerobic and anoxic stage strengthened the intracellular carbon storage and endogenous denitrification. Low dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration (1-2 mg/L) in oxic zone promoted the simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) and saved aeration energy, nitrifiers were enriched with the biofilm carriers and nitrification performance was strengthened, so oxic hydraulic retention time (HRT) could be shortened to avoid excessive polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) consumption which would be used for the latter anoxic denitrification. In a steady state, the system achieved advanced nitrogen and phosphorus removal (TIN (total inorganic nitrogen) <= 3 mg/L, PO43- - P <= 0.2 mg/L) with a high removal efficiency of 92.15% and 92.67%, respectively, and PHA played a major role for P-uptake and endogenous denitrification. Microbial community analysis demonstrated that PAOs and GAOs were enriched and performed aerobic P-uptake and anoxic endogenous denitrification, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据