4.7 Article

Preparation, characterization, and application of multiple stimuli-responsive rattle-type magnetic hollow molecular imprinted poly (ionic liquids) nanospheres (Fe3O4@void@PILMIP) for specific recognition of protein

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 337, 期 -, 页码 722-732

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.159

关键词

Rattle-type structure; Ionic liquid; Molecular imprinted polymer; Protein; Multiple stimuli-responsive

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21366019, 20806037, 20876131]
  2. Jiangxi Province academic and technical leaders of major academic disciplines [20162BCB22010]
  3. Key Laboratory of Coa1 Gasification and Energy Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education [2016KY11-049]
  4. Jiangxi Province Young Scientists (Jinggang Star) Cultivation Plan [20112BCB23002]
  5. Jiangxi Province Higher School Science and Technology Landing Plan Projects [KJLD13012]
  6. Special Funds for Graduate Student Innovation in Jiangxi Province [YC2014-S013]
  7. Jiangxi Province Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program [201310403040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For specific recognition of protein, novel rattle-type magnetic hollow molecular imprinted poly (ionic liquids) nanospheres have been prepared, and bovine serum albumin was selected as the model protein. The rattle-type magnetic Fe3O4@void@PILMIP nanospheres were synthesized by the hard templating method, and characterized by SEM, TEM, FTIR, TGA, and VSM. The as-prepared Fe3O4@void@PILMIP nanospheres could be responsive to external magnetic field, environmental temperature and pH. The results of adsorption isotherm and kinetics showed that the Fe3O4@void@PILMIP nanospheres possessed good recognition and high adsorption capacity of bovine serum albumin. The selective and competitive recognition experiments indicated that the Fe3O4@void@PILMIP nanospheres could selectively recognize bovine serum albumin compared with other proteins (bovine hemoglobin, ovalbumin and lysozyme).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据