4.7 Article

Metal-organic framework templated synthesis of porous NiCo2O4/ZnCo2O4/CO3O4 hollow polyhedral nanocages and their enhanced pseudocapacitive properties

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 351, 期 -, 页码 74-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.070

关键词

Supercapacitor; Nickel; Cobalt; Zeolitic imidazolate framework-67; Nanocage

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571245]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20131249]
  3. Senior Personnel Scientific Research Foundation of Jiangsu University [15JDG084]
  4. Natural Science Fund Project of Colleges in Jiangsu Province [16KJB430008]
  5. College Students Innovative Practice Fund of Jiangsu University Industrial Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel composite porous NiCo2O4/ZnCo2O4/Co3O4 hollow polyhedral nanocage is prepared by etching and the coprecipitation mechanism using the zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 as template. The use of the organic ligand in the template can prevent the agglomeration of the metal caused by high temperature calcination, which is beneficial to obtain the metal oxide nanocages composites with uniform particle size. The unique hollow nanocage structure of the composite material has a complex shell and shows a porous network-like structure which can provide more active sites, and promote the redox reaction of electrode material. At the current density of 1 A g(-1) and 10 A g(-1), the nanocage exhibits the specific capacitance of 1892.5 F.g(-1) and 1135 F.g(-1), respectively. After the 2000 cycles, the nanocage shows 66% of the capacitance retention rate and good cycle stability. Moreover the assembled NiCo2O4/ZnCo2O4/Co3O4//AC hybrid device can be reversibly cycled in a large potential range of 0-1.6 V and can deliver high energy density of 83.11 Wh kg(-1) as well as the maximum power density of 8006.67 W kg(-1). This study provides insight into the synthesis of other composites and more possibilities for constructing more desirable electrode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据