4.7 Article

Fabrication of magnetically recoverable photocatalysts using g-C3N4 for effective separation of charge carriers through like-Z-scheme mechanism with Fe3O4 mediator

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 331, 期 -, 页码 615-625

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.131

关键词

Like-Z-scheme structure; CdS/Fe3O4/g-C3N4; Excellent photo-electron transfer ability; Antibiotics degradation; Universal photocatalytic performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1662125, 21546013, 21606114]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150536]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571683, 1501102B, 2016M590418]
  4. Postgraduate Innovation Programs Foundation of Jiangsu Province [KYCX17_1794]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel efficient magnetic oxidation-reduction like-Z-scheme structure photocatalyst composed of g-C3N4, CdS and the oxidation-reduction mediators of Fe3O4 is successfully synthesized by heat treatment methods. The like-Z- scheme CdS/Fe3O4/g-C3N4 photocatalyst exhibits universal degradation property on removing kinds of antibiotics, and the photocatalytic activity is better than that of CdS/g-C3N4 and pure g-C3N4. The excellent photocatalytic performance is originated from the unique like-Z-scheme structure and oxidation-reduction function of Fe3O4, which effectively separates the hole-electron and sufficiently utilizes the photogenerated carriers for generating more active radicals. The results showed that when the content of Fe3O4 is 10%, the CdS/Fe3O4/gC(3)N(4) exhibited superior activity. The best degradation rate constant K in the like-Z-scheme photocatalyst is approximately 26 times of pure g-C3N4. The important role of Fe3O4 and the photocatalytic mechanism are also discussed in detail. This work not only puts forward a novel design idea of the like-Z-scheme material, but also is expected to be widely applied to the universal removal of kinds of antibiotics according to the practical requirement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据