4.7 Article

Selective catalytic two-electron O-2 reduction for onsite efficient oxidation reaction in heterogeneous electro-Fenton process

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 486-498

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.093

关键词

Oxygen reduction reaction; H2O2; Heterogeneous electro-Fenton; Carbon aerogel; Transition metal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation P.R. China [21677106, 21537003]
  2. Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [14DZ2261100]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation [PCRRF16007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The selective two-electron oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) for an onsite Fenton oxidation reaction over an integrated cathode is a promising method for environmental restoration. Here, an economic iron-copper-embedded carbon aerogel (FeCuC) exhibited high ORR activity (half-wave potential of -0.19 V vs SCE). The electron transfer number (n) over FeCuC was 2.9. Indeed, Fe@(FeC)-C-3 promoted the ORR activity, while Cu enhanced the selectivity of the two-electron ORR. Meanwhile, the simultaneous incorporation of Fe and Cu simultaneously facilitated the sequential Fenton oxidation induced by H2O2. The individual rate constants for ORR and the oxidation reaction successfully revealed the fact that the efficient Fenton oxidation reaction again promotes again the 2-electron O-2 reduction pathway. The application of FeCuC as a cathode in the electro-Fenton (EF) process, involving both high ORR and high Fenton oxidation activities, exhibited efficient total organic carbon (TOC) removal (88-99%) in 240 min for dimethyl phthalate (DMP), imidacloprid (IMI), bisphenol A (BPA) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA). Moreover, five types of sanitary sewage were successively treated to meet the national discharge standards (chemical oxygen demand (COD) < 50 mg L-1) with relatively low specific energy consumption (20-40 kW.h. (kgCOD)(-1)) using FeCuC in the heterogeneous EF process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据