4.7 Article

Latent curing epoxy system with excellent thermal stability, flame retardance and dielectric property

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 347, 期 -, 页码 223-232

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.097

关键词

Epoxy resin; Latent curing agent; Flame retardance; Thermal stability; Dielectric property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21704068, 51773137, 51721091]
  2. Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team [2017TD0006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To obtain a latent curing epoxy system with satisfactory thermal stability, flame retardance and dielectric properties, imidazolium dibenzo[c,e] [1,2] oxaphosphate (IDOP) was synthesized by a facile way and utilized as a latent flame-retardant curing agent for epoxy resins (EP). It was confirmed that IDOP/EP one-pack system kept reactive inert near room temperature and cured efficiently under heating with a moderate heat release. The curing procedure was explored by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), confirming that the flame-retardant group was incorporated into epoxy chains by covalent and/or ionic bonds, hence the intrinsic flame retardance and excellent thermal stability were given to the cured resins finally. With only 15 wt% IDOP additions, the limiting oxygen index (LOI) increased to 37.0% from 20.5% of the reference sample, and UL-94 V-0 rating was achieved. The results of cone calorimetry test further certified that IDOP/EP showed satisfactory flame retardance dominating in gaseous phase, which was confirmed by the results of thermogravimetric analysis/infrared spectrometry (TG-IR). The thermal mechanical behavior of IDOP/EP was also evaluated by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). Especially, the incorporation of the flame-retardant group didn't deteriorate the dielectric properties of the cured resin. Benefiting from the advances, the latent curing epoxy system with excellent comprehensive performance exhibited potential for versatile applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据