4.7 Article

Performance of a novel hybrid membrane bioreactor for treating saline wastewater from mariculture: Assessment of pollutants removal and membrane filtration performance

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 331, 期 -, 页码 695-703

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.032

关键词

Pre-positioned anoxic bio-filter; Moving bed membrane bioreactor; Saline wastewater; TN removal; Membrane filtration performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [51408158]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT.NSRIF.2016098]
  3. scientific research foundation of Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai [HIT(WH) 201403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel AF-MBMBR system (sponge moving bed membrane bioreactor coupled with a pre-positioned anoxic biofilter) was proposed for treating saline wastewater from mariculture. Its development process was divided into 4 stages and the performance in each stage were evaluated in order to clarify the pollutants removal mechanism and the membrane filtration performance. The results showed that TOC removal efficiency was maintained at high level (92.8%-96.2%) throughout the development period due to the utilization of pre-acclimated biomass; Excellent TN (total nitrogen) removal efficiency (up to 93.2%) was progressively obtained which could be attributed to the combined effects of pre-positioned AF and sponge bio-carriers in MBMBR. Indeed, such an effective TN removal for the treatment of saline wastewater was rarely reported. Moreover, the short-cut nitrification-denitrification was observed to be the dominant nitrogen removal pathway in AF-MBMBR. Concerning membrane filtration performance, the filtration cycle was pronouncedly prolonged from 10 days to 44 days. Such an improvement was the result of mitigation on cake layer resistance, which could be attributed to the reduction of MLSS and organic load in MBR induced by pre-positioned AF, as well as the modification effect of sponge bio-carriers on mixed liquor in MBR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据