4.7 Article

Classical theory and electron-scale view of exceptional Cd(II) adsorption onto mesoporous cellulose biochar via experimental analysis coupled with DFT calculations

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 350, 期 -, 页码 1000-1009

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.054

关键词

Mesoporous cellulose biochar; Cd(II); Classical theory; Density functional theory; Micro-mechanism

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2016B020242004, 2015B020237008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The micro-mechanism of heavy metal cations adsorption onto biochar is critical for the renovation of heavy metal contamination. In this work, we prepared three mesoporous cellulose biochar (MCB) adsorbents with different surface area, O and N functionalities content properties through a 300 degrees C carbonization-KOH activation-700 degrees C carbonization-HNO3 oxidation process. The Cd(II) adsorption performance of three MCB was compared, the MCB-1h exhibited best Cd(II) adsorption capacity (368.8 mg/g), and even remained 89% after 5 cycles. DFT calculations identified that MCB-1h had comparatively stronger Cd(II) binding ability, and the results were well consistent with the experimental data. The adsorption micro-mechanism was analyzed in the view of classical theory and electron-scale. The classical theory results proposed that the adsorption process was dominated by chemisorption, and electron sharing or exchange between Cd(II) and biochar occurred. Electron-scale mechanism analysis found that the functional groups and aromatic could provide lone pair electrons and pi electrons for the Cd(II) adsorption, respectively. The N functionalities such as amino, pyridine and pyrrole groups could raise the adsorption ability of the biochar adsorbent. Overall, our results not only provide new insights into the heavy metal adsorption, but also has significant reference value for the subsequent biochar adsorbent preparation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据