4.7 Article

Rational construction of bowl-like MnO2 nanosheets with excellent electrochemical performance for supercapacitor electrodes

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 350, 期 -, 页码 79-88

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.169

关键词

Bowl-like structures; MnO2 nanosheets; Compact contacts; Supercapacitor electrodes; Electrochemical performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602259]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3102017zy063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rational construction of unique hierarchical nanostructured electrodes with excellent electrochemical performance is a promising solution to satisfy the increasing demand of supercapacitors with high energy density. In this work, a novel nanostructure of bowl-like MnO2 nanosheets with ultra-thin thickness (about 4 nm) has been successfully designed by a simple template-assisted hydrothermal method. The composition and morphology of the obtained bowl-like nanostructures have been characterized by FESEM, TEM, XRD, XPS and N-2 adsorption-desorption. Such novel nanostructures present several advantages, such as large surface area, compact contacts, reduced interior space, additional electroactive sites for reversible redox reactions and short/unimpeded diffusion channels for ions/electron transport. When evaluated as electrode materials, bowl-like MnO2 nanosheets exhibit a specific capacitance of 379 F g(-1) at a current density of 0.5 A g(-1), a capacitance retained ratio of 60.5% from 0.5 to 10 A g(-1) and 87.3% capacitance retention after 5000 cycles. Moreover, a possible mechanism for the excellent electrochemical performance of the novel bowl-like nanostructures compared with hollow particles has been systematically studied. We believe that this strategy can open up an avenue and appropriate idea for the rational construction of other transition metal oxides with high performance for the practical supercapacitor applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据