4.7 Article

Quantitative relationships between molecular parameters and reaction rate of organic chemicals in Fenton process in temperature range of 15.8 °C-60°C

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 350, 期 -, 页码 534-540

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.105

关键词

Reaction rate; PLS model; Temperature; Molecular parameters

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [NSFC 21177083, 21537002]
  2. National water pollution control key project [2014ZX07214-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to have a better prediction for the degradation reaction rate constant of organic compounds in Fenton process at different temperatures. A partial least squares (PLS) model was established based on 116 lgk values for 24 organic compounds and quantum chemical parameters, some basic information of molecules as well as the temperature of reaction system. The optimal model was demonstrated as stable, robust and had good predictive ability, with the associate statistical indices of adjusted squared correlation coefficient was 0.722, internal validation was 0.652, external validation was 0.512, cumulative cross-validation coefficient was 0.635, the criterions indicated the developed model could be used to estimate the reaction rate of organic compounds in Fenton process at different temperature. The model contains three components, the most significant descriptors explaining the reaction rate are T and 1/T for component 1, the maximum charge in a carbon atom and minimum charge for nucleophilic attack for component 2, the charge in a hydrogen atom, maximum charge for hydroxyl radical attack and minimum value of bond order for component 3. The applicability domain (APD) of the proposed model was calculated by the Euclidean distances. The results of APD showed that the predictions by the derived PLS model were reliable. The proposed model not only offer a method to predict the reaction rates, but also give some insights of the mechanism for the degradation of organic compounds in Fenton process at different temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据