4.7 Review

A review of gas hydrate growth kinetic models

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 342, 期 -, 页码 9-29

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.120

关键词

Gas hydrates; Hydrate growth; Kinetic models; Heat transfer; Mass transfer; Fluids flow; Porous medium; Numerical modelling; Semi-empirical models

资金

  1. Energy Innovation Research Programme (EIRP) [NRF2015EWTEIRP002-002]
  2. Lloyd's Register Global Technology Centre (LRGTC)
  3. Economic Development Board (EDB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on gas hydrates has progressed over the past several decades as a technology enabler for several innovative applications in the areas of water, energy, and environmental aspects. In this review, we present a systematic review of literature on the kinetic models describing the behaviour of gas hydrate growth. We reviewed a total of 27 classical and state-of-the-art models with their variations. These models were categorized into groups according to their controlling mechanism postulated (heat transfer, mass transfer, or intrinsic kinetic reaction), solution methods adopted (semi-empirical, analytical, or numerical) and reactor configurations (stirred-tank, packed-bed, flow reactor or hydrate film). We examined in-depth the main features of each kinetic model including its formulation, assumptions, governing equations, solution method, strengths and limitations. In addition, we have summarized the critical transport parameters of heat and mass transfer, and the intrinsic kinetic rate parameters associated with hydrate growth in these models. Knowledge gap still exists in understanding the controlling mechanism of gas hydrate growth, which is further augmented by the dynamic behaviour of multiphase fluids flow, the thermodynamics of hydrate-forming system, and the compounding interfacial phenomena. Future efforts need to be devoted to recognize the coupling effect of heat and mass transfer, fluids flow, and gas hydrate phase change behaviour (i.e. its intrinsic kinetics) from multiscale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据