4.7 Article

Oxygen vacancies enhanced HCHO oxidation on a novel NaInO2 supported Pt catalyst at room temperature

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 334, 期 -, 页码 2283-2292

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.114

关键词

Mesoporous NaInO2; Oxygen vacancies; Formaldehyde oxidation; Room temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51272032]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [14JJ5010]
  3. Graduate Student Research Innovation Project in Hunan Province [521293321]
  4. Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A050502044]
  5. Programme of Guangdong Province Ministry of Transportation [201502016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoporous coralloid NaInO2 was prepared through a facile secondary calcination reaction based on mesoporous In2O3. As a binary sodium transition metal oxide containing a layered structure, the application of prepared mesoporous NaInO2 for HCHO oxidation at room temperature was investigated in this study. After 1.0 wt% Pt supported, the sample possessed a high initial removal efficiencies of HCHO up to 91.4% in 15 min, as well as low final residues of less than 5.5 ppm in 60 min. The characterizations indicate that prepared mesoporous NaInO2 has abundant interface structural defects (XRD peak shifting) and substantial BET surface area of 51.9 m(2)/g, which may generate surface oxygen vacancies manifesting as large amounts of chemisorbed oxygen (OC/Ototal as 36.09%). According to the research results, surface oxygen vacancies might help greatly to capture gaseous HCHO molecules, where chemisorbed oxygen being a cofactor for HCHO oxidation, and then the catalyst transformed HCHO into formate, carbonate and finally CO2 indicated by in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectra (DRIFTS) analysis. Overall, this study provided a promising way for designing Pt-supported catalysts for ambient air purification by introducing surface defects (oxygen vacancies) and chemisorbed oxygens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据