4.7 Article

Fabrication and evaluation of hollow surface molecularly imprinted polymer for rapid and selective adsorption of dibenzothiophene

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 345, 期 -, 页码 414-424

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.128

关键词

Hollow surface imprinted polymer; Dibenzothiophene; Adsorption; Porous magnetic carbon microsphere; Desulfurization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21476260, 21336011, 21236009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid and selective recognition and adsorption of dibenzothiophene (DBT) was obtained by a novel hollow surface molecular imprinted polymer (SMIP/HCMS), prepared using alpha-methacrylic acid (MAA) as the functional monomer and porous magnetic carbon microspheres (p-Fe3O4@C) as the sacrificial support matrix. Some key preparation conditions were systematically optimized. SMIP/HCMS was examined by the characterization of Xray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, N-2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, and thermogravimetric analysis. The adsorption kinetics, adsorption isotherms, selective recognition, and regenerative performance of SMIP/HCMS were also evaluated in detail. The adsorption capacity of SMIP/HCMS for DBT reached 62.06 mg g(-1) after 80 min, in comparison with 30.12 mg g(-1) of the corresponding non-imprinted polymer and 24.85 mg g(-1) of SMIP/p-Fe3O4@C. In addition, the adsorption kinetics and isotherm data of DBT could be well fitted with the pseudo-first-order kinetic model and Langmuir isotherm, respectively. Competitive adsorption experiments demonstrated that SMIP/HCMS possessed a greater affinity towards DBT than other analogue molecules. Finally, SMIP/HCMS could be used eight times without significant loss in the adsorption capacity. This work indicated the potentiality of SMIP/HCMS, combining using p-Fe3O4@C as the support matrix with the hollow surface molecular imprinting technology, in the selective removal of DBT from the oil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据