4.3 Article

Fixed-bed column performance of methylene blue biosorption by Luffa cylindrica: statistical and mathematical modeling

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS
卷 205, 期 11, 页码 1537-1554

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2018.1460364

关键词

Biosorption; Column study; Luffa cylindrica; Methylene blue; Response surface methodology; Surface modification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the adsorption capacity of Iranian Luffa cylindrica as a natural lignocellulosic adsorbent for biosorption of methylene blue (MB) using a fixed-bed column. The response surface methodology based on central composite design was used to evaluate the interactive effects of three major operating parameters (inlet MB concentration, Luffa dosage, and feed flow rate) on the dye removal percentage (response variable). The significance of the proposed quadratic model was validated by a high coefficient of determination (R-2=0.995) and a low p value (<0.001). The optimum biosorption conditions were determined as inlet MB concentration 38.66mgL(-1), Luffa dosage 2.78g, and feed flow rate 5mLmin(-1), and the maximum MB removal efficiency was founded to be 51% (q(max)=21.4mgg(-1)) at optimum conditions. The breakthrough curves were predicted by the Adams-Bohart and Thomas models using nonlinear regression analysis, whereas the experimental data fitted well with the Thomas model (R-2 approximate to 0.96-0.98). Further surface modification studies enabled us to achieve the maximum MB removal efficiency of 77% (q(max)=46.58mgg(-1)) with NaOH-modified Luffa, which is attributed to the intensification of the negatively charged surface of the base-modified adsorbent with hydroxyl groups. The nature of biosorbent-dye interactions was also evaluated by FTIR analysis. The highest desorption performance of MB from Luffa fibers was obtained with HCl solution reaching a desorbed amount of q(des)=130.5mg in the column studies. The ion exchange is introduced as the dominant biosorption mechanism of MB onto Luffa fibers in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据