4.4 Article

Intrinsically disordered protein-specific force field CHARMM36IDPSFF

期刊

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
卷 92, 期 4, 页码 1722-1735

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.13342

关键词

CHARMM; coil database; force field; intrinsically disordered proteins

资金

  1. Center for HPC at Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFE0103300]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31770771, 31620103901]
  4. Medical Engineering Cross Fund of Shanghai Jiaotong University [YG2015MS56, YG2017MS08]
  5. National Institutes of Health/NIGMS [GM093040, GM079383]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are closely related to various human diseases. Because IDPs lack certain tertiary structure, it is difficult to use X-ray and NMR methods to measure their structures. Therefore, molecular dynamics simulation is a useful tool to study the conformer distribution of IDPs. However, most generic protein force fields were found to be insufficient in simulations of IDPs. Here, we report our development for the CHARMM community. Our residue-specific IDP force field (CHARMM36IDPSFF) was developed based on the base generic force field with CMAP corrections for all 20 naturally occurring amino acids. Multiple tests show that the simulated chemical shifts with the newly developed force field are in quantitative agreement with NMR experiment and are more accurate than the base generic force field. Comparison of J-couplings with previous work shows that CHARMM36IDPSFF and its corresponding base generic force field have their own advantages. In addition, CHARMM36IDPSFF simulations also agree with experiment for SAXS profiles and radii of gyration of IDPs. Detailed analysis shows that CHARMM36IDPSFF can sample more diverse and disordered conformers. These findings confirm that the newly developed force field can improve the balance of accuracy and efficiency for the conformer sampling of IDPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据