4.7 Review

Influenza Vaccination Strategies: Comparing Inactivated and Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccines

期刊

VACCINES
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 373-389

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines3020373

关键词

Influenza; vaccination; immunization; live attenuated vaccine; immunity; antibodies; T-cells

资金

  1. Ministry of Health and Care Services, Norway
  2. EU [601738, 115672]
  3. Helse Vest, RCN Globvac [220670]
  4. K.G. Jebsen Centre for Influenza Vaccine Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influenza is a major respiratory pathogen causing annual outbreaks and occasional pandemics. Influenza vaccination is the major method of prophylaxis. Currently annual influenza vaccination is recommended for groups at high risk of complications from influenza infection such as pregnant women, young children, people with underlying disease and the elderly, along with occupational groups such a healthcare workers and farm workers. There are two main types of vaccines available: the parenteral inactivated influenza vaccine and the intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine. The inactivated vaccines are licensed from 6 months of age and have been used for more than 50 years with a good safety profile. Inactivated vaccines are standardized according to the presence of the viral major surface glycoprotein hemagglutinin and protection is mediated by the induction of vaccine strain specific antibody responses. In contrast, the live attenuated vaccines are licensed in Europe for children from 2-17 years of age and provide a multifaceted immune response with local and systemic antibody and T cell responses but with no clear correlate of protection. Here we discuss the immunological immune responses elicited by the two vaccines and discuss future work to better define correlates of protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据