4.5 Article

A rigorous approach to predict nitrogen-crude oil minimum miscibility pressure of pure and nitrogen mixtures

期刊

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
卷 399, 期 -, 页码 30-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2015.04.003

关键词

Minimum miscibility pressure; Nitrogen; Lean gas; Genetic programming; Constrained multivariable search methods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen has been appeared as a competitive gas injection alternative for gas-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. Minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) is the most important parameter to successfully design N-2 flooding, which is traditionally measured through time consuming, expensive and cumbersome experiments. In this communication, genetic programming (GP) and constrained multivariable search methods have been combined to create a simple correlation for accurate determination of the MMP of N-2-crude oil, based on the explicit functionality of reservoir temperature as well as thermodynamic properties of crude oil and injection gas. The parameters of the developed correlation include reservoir temperature, average critical temperature of injection gas, volatile and intermediate fractions of reservoir oil and heptane plus-fraction molecular weight of crude oil. A set of experimental data pool from the literature was collected to evaluate and compare the results of the developed correlation with pre-existing correlations through statistical and graphical error analyses. The results of this study illustrate that the proposed correlation is more reliable and accurate than the preexisting models in a wide range of thermodynamic and process conditions. The proposed correlation predicts the total data set (93 MMP data of pure and N-2 mixture streams as well as lean gases) with an average absolute relative error of 10.02%. Finally, by employing the relevancy factor, it was found that the intermediate components of crude oil have the most significant impact on the nitrogen MMP estimation. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据