4.6 Article

Treatment With the Neutralizing Antibody Against Repulsive Guidance Molecule-a Promotes Recovery From Impaired Manual Dexterity in a Primate Model of Spinal Cord Injury

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 561-572

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx338

关键词

corticospinal tract; manual dexterity; primates; repulsive guidance molecule-a; spinal cord injury

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) program from the Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [15H01434]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H01611, 15H01434, 16H02454, 17K19454, 17H05567] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Axons in the mature mammalian central nervous system have only a limited capacity to grow/regenerate after injury, and spontaneous recovery of motor functions is therefore not greatly expected in spinal cord injury (SCI). To promote functional recovery after SCI, it is critical that corticospinal tract (CST) fibers reconnect properly with target spinal neurons through enhanced axonal growth/regeneration. Here, we applied antibody treatment against repulsive guidance molecule-a (RGMa) to a monkey model of SCI. We found that inhibition of upregulated RGMa around the lesioned site in the cervical cord resulted in recovery from impaired manual dexterity by accentuated penetration of CST fibers into laminae VII and IX, where spinal interneurons and motoneurons are located, respectively. Furthermore, pharmacological inactivation following intracortical microstimulation revealed that the contralesional, but not the ipsilesional, primary motor cortex was crucially involved in functional recovery at a late stage in our SCI model. The present data indicate that treatment with the neutralizing antibody against RGMa after SCI is a potential target for achieving restored manual dexterity in primates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据