4.6 Article

Term or Preterm Cesarean Section Delivery Does Not Lead to Long-term Detrimental Consequences in Mice

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 2424-2436

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy112

关键词

autism spectrum disorders; birth; GABA; prematurity

资金

  1. Fondation Bettencourt Schueller
  2. France's Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-14-CE13-0021-01]
  3. Neurochlore
  4. A*MIDEX project - Investissements d'Avenir French Government program [A*M-AAP-TR-14-02-140522-13.02-BURNASHEV-HLS]
  5. Federation pour la Recherche sur le Cerveau (FRC)
  6. Fellowship CIFRE-ANRT [2014/1056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epidemiological studies have provided contradictory data on the deleterious sequels of cesarean section (C-section) delivery and their links with developmental brain disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorders. To gain better insight on these issues, we have now compared physiological, morphological, and behavioral parameters in vaginal, term, and preterm C-section delivered mice. We report that C-section delivery does not lead to long-term behavioral alterations though preterm C-section delivery modifies communicative behaviors in pups. Moreover, C-section delivery neither alters the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) developmental excitatory to inhibitory shift nor the frequency or amplitude of glutamatergic and GABAergic postsynaptic currents in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. However, these neurons present an underdeveloped dendritic arbor at birth in pups born by C-section delivery, but this difference disappears 1 day later suggesting an accelerated growth after birth. Therefore, C-section delivery, with prematurity as an aggravating factor, induces transient developmental delays but neither impacts the GABA developmental sequence nor leads to long-term consequences in mice. The deleterious sequels of C-section delivery described in epidemiological studies might be due to a perinatal insult that could be aggravated by C-section delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据