4.7 Article

Nano-hydroxyapatite bioactive glass composite scaffold with enhanced mechanical and biological performance for tissue engineering application

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 44, 期 13, 页码 15735-15746

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.248

关键词

Hydroxyapatite; Bioactive glass; Composite biomaterial; Gel-casting; Scaffold; Bone tissue engineering

资金

  1. Marine Biotechnology Program - Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Republic of Korea [20150220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Composite biomaterials can improve the mechanical and biological properties of ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering application. In this study hydroxyapatite (HAp), and bioactive glass ceramics were synthesized by co-precipitation and ultrasound assisted sol-gel method. The synthesized HAp (80 wt.-%) and bioglass (15 wt.-%) bioceramics were further used with aluminum oxide (3 wt.-%) and starch (2 wt%) to prepare a composite biomaterial. The composite biomaterial was finally used to fabricate scaffold materials by employing nontoxic binder mediated gel-casting approach. The synthesized composite material and developed scaffolds were characterized through different physical, chemical, and morphological analyses, mechanical study, and in vitro biological assays. The synthesized scaffold exhibited 20-25% porosity, with a high compressive strength of similar to 157 +/- 2 MPa, and Tensile strength of similar to 83 +/- 2 MPa after sintering at 1200 degrees C for 2 h. The in vitro biological study confirmed the nontoxic behavior of the composite biomaterial and developed scaffolds with MG-63 osteoblast-like cell line. The developed composite scaffold facilitated new cell attachment, growth, and proliferation on its surface, all of which correlates with good osteoconductive properties. The developed scaffolds effectively simulated the morphology, porosity, mechanical property, and bioactivity of the bone structure for load-bearing tissue engineering application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据