4.7 Article

Damage mechanism analysis to the carbon fiber and fiber-ceramic interface tailoring of Cf/ZrC-SiC using PyC coating

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 44, 期 15, 页码 19038-19043

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.065

关键词

Carbon fiber; Chemical etching; Interface diffusion; Interfaces tailoring

资金

  1. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51525201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [11572353]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining [17-M-07]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT.BRETIII.201506]
  5. Major State Basic Search Program [2014CB46505]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The damage mechanism of carbon fiber and fiber-ceramic interface of CarC-SiC were investigated and revealed. The chemical reactions of C with ZrO2 and SiO2 impurities during the sintering resulted in the surface and grain etching of fiber. The ZrC-SiC ceramics diffused into interface to form a strong bonding under high temperature and press, leading to a failure of stress release and guiding the crack propagation direct across fiber. Both consequently impeded the fiber pull-out and bridging. By obvious contrast, the chemical etching of fiber was effectively inhibited utilizing PyC coating as transition layer, and the strong bonding of fiber with ceramic was relieved at the same time replaced by a relatively weak bonding. As a result, the fiber pull-out and fiber bridging were boosted with a longer length more than 50 mu m, over 2 times of uncoated composite, accompanied with obvious crack branching and deflection, together resulting in a graceful mechanical feedback with 2.5 times of work of fracture and improved fracture toughness. This work not only revealed the microstructure forms and inherent mechanism on structure damage of carbon fiber, but also offered an effective method of protecting fiber and tailoring the interface bonding, thereby guiding the design of C-f/ZrC-SiC with graceful mechanical performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据