4.7 Article

Fabrication of low cost, green silica based ceramic hollow fibre membrane prepared from waste rice husk for water filtration application

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 44, 期 9, 页码 10498-10509

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.067

关键词

Ceramic hollow fibre membrane; Rice husk; Pure water flux; Water treatment

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Malaysia under the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence Scheme [R.J090301.7846.4J192]
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [Q.J130000.2546.12H25]
  3. Nippon Sheet Glass Foundation for Materials Science and Engineering under Overseas Research Grant Scheme [R.J130000.7346.4B218]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to develop low cost ceramic membranes and effectively utilize abundantly and dumped waste agriculture, fabrication of green silica based ceramic hollow fibre membranes from waste rice husk was evaluated. Rice husk was converted into amorphous and crystalline silica based rice husk ash (ARHA and CRHA) by burning process at 600 degrees C and 1000 degrees C, respectively. The properties of silica based rice husk ashes were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), x-ray powder diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), BET analysis, thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis (TG/DTA) and x-ray fluorescence (XRF). Effect of silica content and sintering temperature towards membrane fabrication were investigated and characterized in term of morphological properties, mechanical strength, surface roughness, pore size distribution, porosity and pure water flux (PWF). The ceramic hollow fibre membrane (CHFM) prepared at 37.5 wt % CRHA content and sintered at 1200 degrees C achieved a good mechanical strength (71.2 MPa) and excellent porosity (50.2%). As a result, high PWF with value 300 L/m(2) h and stable at 20 min was obtained. Due to the excellent pure water flux, the prepared ceramic membrane from waste rice husk hold promise for water treatment application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据