4.7 Article

Low toxicity antisolvent synthesis of composition-tunable luminescent all-inorganic perovskite nanocrystals

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 44, 期 15, 页码 18123-18128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.018

关键词

Perovskite nanocrystals; Low toxicity antisolvent synthesis; Composition dependent luminescent; Phase transformation

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Projects for Distinguished Young Scholars of Sichuan Province [2015JQ0013]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [A0920502051408-10, ZYGX2009Z0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All-inorganic perovskite nanocrystals have held great promise as incredibly effective luminescent materials and also have been synthesized efficiently by room temperature approaches. Toluene, a high toxicity solvent, is often used as a valid antisolvent in ligand-assisted reprecipitation strategy, which badly restricts the commercial application of this convenient method. Here, aiming to address the toluene toxicity issue, the low toxic tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) is employed as a new alternative antisolvent to achieve high uniform and composition dependent luminescent all-inorganic perovskite Cs4PbX6 (X = I, Br, Cl) combined with CsPbX3 (X = I, Br, Cl) nanocrystals with tunable emission large-span wavelengths (626-437 nm) and remarkably narrow full width at half-maximum (FWHM) monochromaticity (down to 19 nm). Meanwhile, the ratio of CsBr to PbBr2 is proved to be a critical factor to control the crystalline phase of the resulting perovskite nanocrystals. Additionally, one monochromatic light-emitting diode (LED) lamp with brightly pure green emission is fabricated based on bromine-based perovskite nanocrystals. This newly developed low toxicity antisolvent synthesis (LTaS) is suitable candidate for commercial production in an environmentally-friendly way, and the as-obtained perovskite materials with superior optical merits will be brought to the forefront of lighting and displays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据