4.7 Article

Nonlinear bending and instability analysis of bioceramics composed with magnetite nanoparticles: Fabrication, characterization, and simulation

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 44, 期 8, 页码 9540-9549

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.175

关键词

Bioceramics; Tissue engineering; Nonlinear instability; Nanocomposites; Nonlinear bending

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetite is a bioresorbable material that has been widely employed in bioengineering domain, drug-delivery operations, and hyperthermia treatment. In the biomedical engineering, the major focus is on the mechanical properties of materials used in orthopedic and dental implants. In the present investigation, beam-type bone implant made of bredigite composed with magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs) is fabricated with a customized three dimensional (3D) printing, the nonlinear bending and postbuckling behaviors of it are studied. To accomplish this purpose, the Young's modulus of the prepared bio-nanocomposite material is obtained experimentally corresponding to different MNP weight fractions and sizes of the nanoparticles as well as their morphology shapes. In order to prepare the bio-nanocomposite material, the planetary high energy ball milling (HEBM) is put to use to mix the bredigite bioceramic powder as a bioactive matrix with various weight fractions of MNPs. After that, based upon a developed analytical solution, the nonlinear bending and instability response of the bio-nanocomposite beam-type bone implant are analyzed corresponding to various MNP weight fractions and morphology shapes of the material. It is found that for the bio-nanocomposite implant with smaller composite crystallite size, the maximum and minimum buckling loads are for irregular and mesoporous morphology shapes, respectively. On the hand, for the bio-nanocomposite bone implant with larger composite particle size, the maximum and minimum buckling loads are related to, respectively, the spongy and porous morphology shapes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据