4.6 Review

GPCR desensitization: Acute and prolonged phases

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 9-16

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.01.024

关键词

Endocytosis; Arrestin; Ubiquitin; Phosphorylation; Recycling

资金

  1. NIH [HL118369, HL114643]
  2. American Heart Association [15GRNT25550051]
  3. Burroughs Wellcome Career Award for Medical Scientists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transduce a wide array of extracellular signals and regulate virtually every aspect of physiology. While GPCR signaling is essential, overstimulation can be deleterious, resulting in cellular toxicity or uncontrolled cellular growth. Accordingly, nature has developed a number of mechanisms for limiting GPCR signaling, which are broadly referred to as desensitization, and refer to a decrease in response to repeated or continuous stimulation. Short-term desensitization occurs over minutes, and is primarily associated with beta-arrestins preventing G protein interaction with a GPCR. Longer-term desensitization, referred to as downregulation, occurs over hours to days, and involves receptor internalization into vesicles, degradation in lysosomes and decreased receptor mRNA levels through unclear mechanisms. Phosphorylation of the receptor by GPCR kinases (GRKs) and the recruitment of beta-arrestins is critical to both these short-and long-term desensitization mechanisms. In addition to phosphorylation, both the GPCR and beta-arrestins are modified post-translationally in several ways, including by ubiquitination. For many GPCRs, receptor ubiquitination promotes degradation of agonist-activated receptors in the lysosomes. Other proteins also play important roles in desensitization, including phosphodiesterases, RGS family proteins and A-kinase-anchoring proteins. Together, this intricate network of kinases, ubiquitin ligases, and adaptor proteins orchestrate the acute and prolonged desensitization of GPCRs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据