4.3 Article

The structure and function of angler mental models about fish population ecology: The influence of specialization and target species

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2015.09.001

关键词

Ecological knowledge; Fuzzy cognitive mapping; Mental model; Northern pike; Recreational fishing

资金

  1. Federal Ministry for Education and Research [01UU0907]
  2. Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries in Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As devotion to a recreational activity increases with specialization, recreationists' ecological understanding (i.e., mental models) of the resource system is also expected to change. To test this hypothesis, we collected cognitive maps of northern pike (Esox lucius) ecology from anglers (N=235) and assessed their relation to anglers' level of specialization and preferred target species. We also compared angler cognitive maps with cognitive maps collected from fisheries scientists (N=17) to examine if increased specialization among anglers led to similar ecological understanding of formally-trained fishery professionals. Our results indicate that, regardless of target species, as anglers become more specialized they tend to refine their structural understanding of pike ecology by simplifying relations among the ecological factors that affect pike populations. Further, although the refined ecological understanding of more specialized anglers' was found to be structurally dissimilar to experts, the mental models of pike ecology of more specialized anglers, particularly those with experience of the target species pike, were found to be functionally similar to how trained fisheries biologists viewed pike ecology. Our results suggest that more specialized anglers develop simple heuristics to deal with complex ecological issues, which may in turn affect the uptake of information and the acceptability of management actions designed by agencies and managers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据