4.5 Article

Proteomic Analysis of the Antidepressant Effects of Shen-Zhi-Ling in Depressed Patients: Identification of Proteins Associated with Platelet Activation and Lipid Metabolism

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 1123-1135

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-018-0582-9

关键词

Proteomics; Depression; Antidepressant effect; Shen-Zhi-Ling; Kai-Xin-San; Platelet activation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81673877, 81373996, 81173430]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shen-Zhi-Ling (SZL) is a Chinese medicine formulated from a Kai-Xin-San decoction that is commonly used to treat depression caused by dual deficiencies in the heart and spleen. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated biological changes in depression patients (DPs) exhibiting antidepressant responses to SZL treatment using proteomic techniques. We performed label-free quantitative proteomic analysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to discover and examine altered proteins involved in depression and antidepressant treatment. Serum samples were collected from DPs, DPs who underwent 8 weeks of SZL treatment and healthy controls (HCs). The proteins that differed among the three groups were further validated by Western blot analysis. By performing multivariate analyses, we identified 12 potential serum biomarkers that were differentially expressed among the HC, DP, and SZL groups. We then confirmed the significant changes in alpha-1-antitrypsin, von Willebrand factors, apolipoprotein C-III, and alpha-2-macroglobulin among the three groups by performing Western blot analysis, which supported the proteomic results. Profiling the proteomic changes in DPs treated with SZL could improve our understanding of the pathways involved in SZL responses, such as alterations in platelet activation, inflammatory regulation, and lipid metabolism. Future studies involving larger patient cohorts are necessary to draw more definitive conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据