4.7 Article

Stem cells from human apical papilla decrease neuro-inflammation and stimulate oligodendrocyte progenitor differentiation via activin-A secretion

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
卷 75, 期 15, 页码 2843-2856

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-018-2764-5

关键词

Spinal cord; Dental stem cells; Inflammation; Oligodendrocyte progenitor cells; Differentiation

资金

  1. Universite Catholique de Louvain (FSR)
  2. International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia (IRP)
  3. MRC [MR/N022556/1, MR/M020827/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Action Medical Research [2318] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/N022556/1, MR/M020827/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secondary damage following spinal cord injury leads to non-reversible lesions and hampering of the reparative process. The local production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha can exacerbate these events. Oligodendrocyte death also occurs, followed by progressive demyelination leading to significant tissue degeneration. Dental stem cells from human apical papilla (SCAP) can be easily obtained at the removal of an adult immature tooth. This offers a minimally invasive approach to re-use this tissue as a source of stem cells, as compared to biopsying neural tissue from a patient with a spinal cord injury. We assessed the potential of SCAP to exert neuroprotective effects by investigating two possible modes of action: modulation of neuro-inflammation and oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) differentiation. SCAP were co-cultured with LPS-activated microglia, LPS-activated rat spinal cord organotypic sections (SCOS), and LPS-activated co-cultures of SCOS and spinal cord adult OPC. We showed for the first time that SCAP can induce a reduction of TNF-alpha expression and secretion in inflamed spinal cord tissues and can stimulate OPC differentiation via activin-A secretion. This work underlines the potential therapeutic benefits of SCAP for spinal cord injury repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据