4.7 Article

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers of F-652, a recombinant human interleukin-22 dimer, in healthy subjects

期刊

CELLULAR & MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 473-482

出版社

CHIN SOCIETY IMMUNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/s41423-018-0029-8

关键词

Interleukin-22; F-652; Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacodynamics; Safety

资金

  1. Generon (Shanghai) Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

F-652 is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of two human interleukin-22 (IL-22) molecules linked to an immunoglobulin constant region (IgG(2)-Fc). IL-22 plays critical roles in promoting tissue repair and suppressing bacterial infection. The safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), tolerability, and biomarkers of F-652 were evaluated following a single dose in healthy male volunteers in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Following single-dose subcutaneous (SC) injection of F-652 at 2.0 mu g/kg into healthy subjects, six out of six subjects experienced delayed injection site reactions, which presented as erythematous and/or discoid eczematous lesions 10 to 17 days post-dosing. F-652 was then administered to the healthy subjects via an intravenous (IV) infusion at 2.0, 10, 30, and 45 mu g/kg. No severe adverse event (SAE) was observed during the study. Among the IV-dosed cohorts, eye and skin treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in the 30 and 45 mu g/kg cohorts. F-652 IV dosing resulted in linear increases in C-max and AUC((0-t)), and the T-1/2 ranged from 39.4 to 206 h in the cohorts. An IV injection of F-652 induced dosedependent increases in serum marker serum amyloid A, C-reactive protein, and FIB, and decreased serum triglycerides. The serum levels of 36 common pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines were not altered by the treatment of F-652 at 45 mu g/kg. In conclusion, IV administration of F-652 to healthy male volunteers is safe and well-tolerated and demonstrates favorable PK and pharmacodynamic properties. These results warrant further clinical development of F-652 to treat inflammatory diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据