4.3 Article

Heat acclimation increases inflammatory and apoptotic responses to subsequent LPS challenge in C2C12 myotubes

期刊

CELL STRESS & CHAPERONES
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 1117-1128

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12192-018-0923-0

关键词

Skeletal muscle; Hyperthermia; Inflammation; Apoptosis

资金

  1. Department of Exercise Science within the Congdon School of Health Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigated the ability of a 6-day heat acclimation protocol to impart heat acclimation-mediated cross-tolerance (HACT) in C2C12 myotubes, as indicated by changes in inflammatory and apoptotic responses to subsequent lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge. Myotubes were incubated at 40 degrees C for 2 h/day over 6 days (HA) or maintained for 6 days at 37 degrees C (C). Following 24 h recovery, myotubes from each group received either no stimulation or 500 ng/ml LPS for 2 h (HA + LPS and C + LPS, respectively). Cell lysates were collected and analyzed for protein markers of the heat shock response, inflammation, and apoptosis. As compared to C, HA exhibited an elevated heat shock response [HSP70 (+ 99%); HSP60 (+ 216%); HSP32 (+ 40%); all p < 0.01] and reduced inflammatory and apoptotic signaling [p-NF-kappa B:NF-kappa B (-99%%); p-JNK (-49%); all p < 0.01]. When compared to C + LPS, HA + LPS also exhibited an elevated heat shock response [HSP70 (+ 68%); HSP60 (+ 32%); HSP32 (+38%); all p < 0.01]. However, inflammatory and apoptotic responses in HA + LPS were increased [p-IKBa:IKBa (+ 432%); p-NF-kappa B:NF-kappa B (+ 283%); caspase-8p18 (+ 53%); p-JNK (+ 41%); all p < 0.05]. This unanticipated fording may be due to increased TLR4-mediated signaling capacity in HA + LPS, as indicated by upregulation of TLR4 [(+ 24%); MyD88 (+ 308%); p-NIK (+ 199%); and p-IKK alpha/b (+ 81%); all p < 0.05]. Data suggest HA reduces inflammatory and apoptotic signaling in skeletal muscle cells that are maintained under basal conditions. However, HACT is selective and does not apply to TLR4 signaling in the present model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据