4.7 Article

Direct&IT In Vivo&IT Reprogramming with Sendai Virus Vectors Improves Cardiac Function after Myocardial Infarction

期刊

CELL STEM CELL
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 91-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Keio University Program for the Advancement of Next Generation Research Projects
  2. Novartis Research Grant
  3. Research Center Network for Realization of Regenerative Medicine from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  4. Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science
  5. Takeda Science Foundation
  6. SENSHIN Medical Research Foundation
  7. Practical Research Project for Rare/Intractable Diseas from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  8. JSPS [JP16K19428]
  9. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [JP25670394]
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K19678] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct cardiac reprogramming holds great promise for regenerative medicine. We previously generated directly reprogrammed induced cardiomyocyte-like cells (iCMs) by overexpression of Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5 (GMT) using retrovirus vectors. However, integrating vectors pose risks associated with insertional mutagenesis and disruption of gene expression and are inefficient. Here, we show that Sendai virus (SeV) vectors expressing cardiac reprogramming factors efficiently and rapidly reprogram both mouse and human fibroblasts into integration-free iCMs via robust transgene expression. SeV-GMT generated 100-fold more beating iCMs than retroviral-GMT and shortened the duration to induce beating cells from 30 to 10 days in mouse fibroblasts. In vivo lineage tracing revealed that the gene transfer of SeV-GMT was more efficient than retroviral-GMT in reprogramming resident cardiac fibroblasts into iCMs in mouse infarct hearts. Moreover, SeV-GMT improved cardiac function and reduced fibrosis after myocardial infarction. Thus, efficient, non-integrating SeV vectors may serve as a powerful system for cardiac regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据