4.7 Article

Multi-Donor Longitudinal Antibody Repertoire Sequencing Reveals the Existence of Public Antibody Clonotypes in HIV-1 Infection

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 845-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  2. NIH [R01 AI131722]
  3. Tennessee Center for AIDS Research [P30 AI110527]
  4. CTSA award from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [KL2TR000446]
  5. Medical Research Council of South Africa
  6. NIAID [U19 AI51794, 1U01AI136677, T32AI112541]
  7. Human Vaccines Project
  8. NIGMS [T32GM8320]
  9. Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) (CTSA award) [UL1TR002243]
  10. NHLBI [T32HL069765]
  11. Vanderbilt Program for Next Generation Vaccines
  12. Global Health Vaccine Accelerator Platforms - Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [48]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Characterization of single antibody lineages within infected individuals has provided insights into the development of Env-specific antibodies. However, a systems-level understanding of the humoral response against HIV-1 is limited. Here, we interrogated the antibody repertoires of multiple HIV-infected donors from an infection-naive state through acute and chronic infection using next-generation sequencing. This analysis revealed the existence of public'' antibody clonotypes that were shared among multiple HIV-infected individuals. The HIV-1 reactivity for representative antibodies from an identified public clonotype shared by three donors was confirmed. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of publicly available antibody repertoire sequencing datasets revealed antibodies with high sequence identity to known HIV-reactive antibodies, even in repertoires that were reported to be HIV naive. The discovery of public antibody clonotypes in HIV-infected individuals represents an avenue of significant potential for better understanding antibody responses to HIV-1 infection, as well as for clonotype-specific vaccine development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据