4.7 Article

Monoamine oxidase-dependent endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria dysfunction and mast cell degranulation lead to adverse cardiac remodeling in diabetes

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 1518-1532

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41418-018-0071-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. EFSD/Sanofi research grant
  2. Leducq Transatlantic Network of Excellence, MIUR
  3. University of Padova Strategico grant
  4. CNR
  5. Medical Research Council UK [MC_U105663142]
  6. Wellcome Trust [110159/Z/15/Z]
  7. NIH [HL52141]
  8. Marie Sklodowska Curie fellowship through the RADOX ITN network
  9. MRC [MC_U105663142, MC_UU_00015/3] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors ameliorate contractile function in diabetic animals, but the mechanisms remain unknown. Equally elusive is the interplay between the cardiomyocyte alterations induced by hyperglycemia and the accompanying inflammation. Here we show that exposure of primary cardiomyocytes to high glucose and pro-inflammatory stimuli leads to MAO-dependent increase in reactive oxygen species that causes permeability transition pore opening and mitochondrial dysfunction. These events occur upstream of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and are abolished by the MAO inhibitor pargyline, highlighting the role of these flavoenzymes in the ER/mitochondria cross-talk. In vivo, streptozotocin administration to mice induced oxidative changes and ER stress in the heart, events that were abolished by pargyline. Moreover, MAO inhibition prevented both mast cell degranulation and altered collagen deposition, thereby normalizing diastolic function. Taken together, these results elucidate the mechanisms underlying MAO-induced damage in diabetic cardiomyopathy and provide novel evidence for the role of MAOs in inflammation and inter-organelle communication. MAO inhibitors may be considered as a therapeutic option for diabetic complications as well as for other disorders in which mast cell degranulation is a dominant phenomenon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据