4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Catalytic activity of an economically sustainable fly-ash-metal-organic-framework composite towards biomass valorization

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 314, 期 -, 页码 137-146

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.01.018

关键词

Furfural; Metal organic framework; Fly ash; Hydrothermal stability; Bronsted acidity

资金

  1. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology [IGN12EG01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low thermal stability and insufficient Bronsted acidity are the deficiencies of conventional metal-organic-frameworks (MOFs), which would greatly limit their applications particularly for high temperature and pressure reactions such as dehydration of carbohydrates. This work has successfully demonstrated the development of a composite of MOF and activated fly ash, and their catalytic application in the xylose-to-furfural dehydration process. The composite is capable of maintaining high stability under severe hydrothermal conditions and even in the acidic medium. In addition, the composite shows its excellent catalytic performance for ten consecutive reaction cycles, which is much better than the bare MOF catalyst, MIL-101 (Cr), obtaining the furfural yield and selectivity of 71% and 80%, respectively. It is proposed that such catalytic activity is mainly attributed to the mutual contribution from the Cr atoms of MIL-101 (Cr) and hydroxyl groups of activated fly ash, acting as Lewis acid centers and Bronsted acid sites, respectively. Besides, the effect of salt concentration on the efficiency of xylose conversion has been studied. The product yield can be enhanced to 78% in the presence of trace amount of sodium chloride solution (35 ppt). This provides a promising direction towards the applications when sea-water is used as the reaction media. In summary, the work shows that the incorporation of fly ash as the composite material not only reduces the cost of synthesis, but also mitigates the fly ash disposal problems to some extent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据