4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Titania versus zinc oxide nanoparticles on mesoporous silica supports as photocatalysts for removal of dyes from wastewater at neutral pH

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 310, 期 -, 页码 32-41

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.061

关键词

Wastewater cleaning; Neutral pH; Photocatalysis Organic dye adsorption and degradation; Silica supported TiO2; Silica supported ZnO

资金

  1. Belgian-Slovenian (FWO-ARRS) bilateral project [N1-0028]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency research programs [P1-0021, P2-0150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the photocatalytic wastewater treatment containing lower concentrations of dyes as pollutants, a suitable photocatalyst may be selected for anionic or cationic dye removal according to the photocatalyst surface charging and desired adsorption/degradation ratio. Herein, for the first time, we evaluate mesoporous silica supported TiO2 versus mesoporous silica supported ZnO photocatalysts at neutral pH and at equal conditions. The evaluation shows that model anionic dye Reactive Blue 19 (RB19) was adsorbed onto silica supported ZnO nanoparticles at neutral pH in a much higher rate than on silica supported TiO2 nanoparticles, even though the surfaces of ZnOe and TiO2-silica composite catalysts were negatively charged in both cases (ca. -20 mV of zeta potential). This was ascribed to the strong positive zeta potential of pure ZnO nanoparticles at neutral pH value (ca. + 37 mV) and consequently to more mixed oxide (spinel-like) ZnO/silica composite behaviour if compared to the physical mixture of oxide TiO2/silica composites. The highest dye adsorption (50%) and the fastest dye degradation (k(app) = 0.0544 min(-1) at 25 degrees C) was observed on disordered ZnO/silica with Zn:Si molar ratio 1:1. Pure TiO2 or silica supported TiO2 nanoparticles were stable under UV irradiation. On the other hand, the interaction between SiO2 and ZnO resulted in increased resistance of ZnO to photocorrosion, which was proven to be an issue in pure ZnO nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据