4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Porous iron-phosphonate nanomaterial as an efficient catalyst for the CO2 fixation at atmospheric pressure and esterification of biomass-derived levulinic acid

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 309, 期 -, 页码 253-262

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.093

关键词

Iron-phosphonate; Nanomaterial; CO2 fixation; Cyclic carbonates; Levulinic acid; Biofuels

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST-SERB), New Delhi, Govt. of India [EMR/2016/004956]
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) New Delhi, Govt. of India [02(0284)/16/EMR-II]
  3. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), DST, Govt. Of India [PDF/2015/000460]
  4. CSIR, New Delhi, India
  5. DST, New Delhi, Govt. of India under FIST program
  6. DST, New Delhi, Govt. of India under PURSE program
  7. DST, New Delhi, Govt. of India under SAP program
  8. UGC, New Delhi, Govt. of India under FIST program
  9. UGC, New Delhi, Govt. of India under PURSE program
  10. UGC, New Delhi, Govt. of India under SAP program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical fixation of CO2 and synthesis of biofuels through convenient reaction pathways are very demanding in the context of sustainable and eco-friendly catalysis. Herein, we report the synthesis of iron-phosphonate nanoparticles HPFP-1(NP) through the simple chemical reaction between hexamethylenediamine-N, N,N',N'-tetrakis-(methylphosphonic acid) and FeCl3 under hydrothermal conditions. The material has been characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), N-2 adsorption/desorption studies and FE-SEM. This porous material showed high catalytic activity for the synthesis of organic carbonates from a wide range of epoxides at room temperature in the presence of CO2 at atmospheric pressure. This nanocatalyst also exhibited excellent catalytic activity for the conversion of levulinic acid into alkyl levulinates. The HPF-P1(NP) catalyst showed high recycling efficiency in these catalytic reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据