3.8 Article

Phosphorus addition reduced microbial respiration during the decomposition of Acacia mangium litter in South Sumatra, Indonesia

期刊

TROPICS
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 113-118

出版社

JAPAN SOC TROPICAL ECOLOGY
DOI: 10.3759/tropics.24.113

关键词

Acacia mangium; decomposition; nitrogen mining; phosphorus; tropics

类别

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [13J02647] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assessing the effects of nutrient addition on organic matter decomposition in tropical tree plantations is essentially important because of the increasing importance of the afforestation along with the increases in the intensified management practices and fertilizer use. We tested the effects of phosphorus (P) addition on microbial respiration during the decomposition of Acacia mangium litters and leaves by using an incubation experiment. Following hypotheses were examined: (i) P addition reduces microbial respiration during the litter decomposition if labile carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) are little; while (ii) the effect is not clear in the fresh leaf decomposition due to the large amount of labile C and N. P addition significantly reduced the rates of microbial respiration during the litter decomposition, with the following possible mechanisms; (i) decrease in C or N investment in phosphatase due to the reduced P requirement makes microbes decompose fewer litters to get C or N, (ii) P addition improved microbial respiratory efficiency and reduced energy required to maintain microbial activity. Meanwhile in high-quality leaf, such decrease in microbial respiration rates during the decomposition by P addition did not occur. We suggested that P fertilization in fast-growing tree plantations in tropics may reduce organic matter decomposition. Since the present study is a short-term incubation study, longer studies or field experiments are required to fully understand the effects of P addition on the organic matter decomposition in P-limited tropical forests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据