4.8 Article

Energy dissipative mechanism of graphene foam materials

期刊

CARBON
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 641-650

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.085

关键词

Graphene foam material; Energy dissipative mechanism; Coarse-grained molecular dynamic method; Stress-strain curve; Microstructural evolution

资金

  1. NSFC [11602270, 11532013, 11372317]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB22040503]
  3. BIT Creative Research Plan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene foam (GrF) is a new kind of multi-porous material with many potential applications owing to its excellent multi-functional properties, especially its dissipation capability. However, both the dissipative mechanism and some experimental phenomena remain poorly understood. Here, systematic coarse-grained molecular dynamic simulations (CGMD) are conducted to study these issues. The typical stress-strain relationships found in experiments under large-strain loading-unloading and small-strain cyclic load are first reproduced. Based on microstructure analysis, three major dissipative mechanisms in the scale of flakes, i.e., rippling, sliding and impacting, are uncovered. The influencing effects of cycle number, strain magnitude and loading rate on dissipation are further investigated. It is found that the much higher dissipation in the first loading cycle is essentially due to drastic flake rearrangements, which decreases to a smaller one in subsequent cycles. In addition, the dissipation increases almost linearly with the strain magnitude in the first cycle, while it increases with a reduced slope in subsequent cycles due to the flake stacking structures. For a given strain magnitude, the dissipation will be enhanced as the loading rate increases. These results deepen our understanding on the dissipative mechanism of GrFs and should be helpful for the development of novel multi-functional graphene-based composites. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据