4.8 Article

Polycyclic aromatic compounds-modified graphitic carbon nitride for efficient visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution

期刊

CARBON
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 134-144

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.089

关键词

Photocatalysis; Hydrogen evolution; Graphitic carbon nitride; Conjugated effect; Polycyclic aromatic compounds

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773074, 21273080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycyclic aromatic compounds with strong conjugated effect, possess the advantage of improving electronic polarizability, thus accelerating the electron transportation. Here, a facile copolymerization between urea and polycyclic aromatic compounds (benzoic acid, naphthoic acid and anthroic acid) has been applied to constructing aromatic rings-grafted graphitic carbon nitride (GCN) photocatalysts. Incorporation of aromatic rings in the GCN network is an effective protocol to extend its pi-conjugated system for visible light harvesting and improves the charge transfer efficiency for prolonging lifetime of photogenerated charge carriers in photocatalytic reactions. The corresponding characterization methods demonstrate that the aromatic rings-modified GCN can effectively narrow the bandgap to favor broad band visible light absorption and suppress recombination of electrons and holes. Remarkably, the moderate conjugated effect of aromatic rings (naphthalene) is crucial to promote charge separation. The developed naphthalene-grafted GCN achieves the highest water splitting performance with hydrogen evolution rate up to 102.1 mmol h(-1), nearly 3.5 times of that of the GCN, and apparent quantum efficiency reaches 5.6% at 450 nm. This finding reveals that the conjugated effect of aromatic rings is significant to control photocatalytic property and brings new ideas for designing aromatic system-modified GCN as highly active photocatalysts towards solar-to-chemical energy conversion. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据