4.8 Article

Crumpled graphene prepared by a simple ultrasonic pyrolysis method for fast photodetection

期刊

CARBON
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 117-124

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.082

关键词

Graphene; Crumpled; Ultrasonic pyrolysis; Fast; Photodetector

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576289, 51401239, 21776308]
  2. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [C201603]
  3. Science Foundation Research Funds [2462014QZDX01]
  4. Thousand Talents Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past decades, graphene has attracted much attention as the host material of photodetectors (PDs), owing to its fascinating mechanical property, ultrahigh carrier mobility and remarkable optical transparency. However, the intrinsic low light absorption of graphene affects its comprehensive application in PDs. Therefore, graphene-based PDs research has focused on hybrid system and optimized graphene structures to enhance photoabsorption. In order to combine the advantages of both approaches, we successfully prepared crumpled reduced graphene oxide (C-rGO) for PDs by a simple ultrasonic pyrolysis method. Through this rapid, one-step capillary-driven route, C-rGO and C-rGO/(ZnO, PbS) composite films can be easily deposited on arbitrary substrates (PET, glass, Al2O3 ceramic and paper). Interestingly, the unique C-rGO PDs shows superior stability and fast transient photocurrent response (rise/decay time of 189/189 ms). Furthermore, by incorporating ZnO and PbS nanoparticles to enhance light absorption, the crumpled hybrid nanostructure PDs demonstrate about four times increased photocurrents and broad-band (UV-Vis-NIR) photodetection features with R of 0.12 A/W. Such crumpled C-rGO-based PDs hold great potentials for future optoelectronic applications, and the ultrasonic pyrolysis method could open a new way for engineering novel nanostructured thin films with high-performance photodetection. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据