4.8 Article

Anisotropy effects in diamond under nanoindentation

期刊

CARBON
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 606-615

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.066

关键词

Single crystal diamond; Nanoindentation; Anisotropy; Plasticity; Molecular dynamics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11332013]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112017CDJXSYY0001]
  3. Chongqing Graduate Student Research Innovation Project [CYB17019]
  4. Chongqing Scientific AMP
  5. Technological Talents Program [KJXX2017001]
  6. Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology [cstc2015jcyjA50008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We performed molecular dynamics simulations for the nanoindentation on (001), (110) and (111) surfaces of a single crystal diamond (SCD) to investigate the orientation-dependence of its mechanical behavior. We found that the elastic and plastic behavior of SCD, such as Young's modulus, critical pressure and hardness, depend strongly on the orientation of the indented surface because of the anisotropic nature of SCD. The load drop events in the P - h curves were observed, which corresponds to a transition from elastic to plastic deformation. The stress distributions induced by indentations on differently oriented surfaces are very different, so are the evolutions and distributions of the dislocations, though it was found that in all the three cases the initial plasticity could be attributed to the nucleation and growth of 1/2 < 110 >{111} perfect dislocation loops, which is consistent with the experimental results and the prediction by the stacking fault energy. It shows that the dislocation distributions exhibit dual-, triple-and four-fold rotation symmetries in the cases of (110), (111) and (001), respectively. The effects of indenter size (R) and speed (v) were also investigated, which show that R and v strongly affect the response of SCD and also verify of the simulated results. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据