4.8 Article

Triazine-graphdiyne: A new nitrogen-carbonous material and its application as an advanced rechargeable battery anode

期刊

CARBON
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 442-450

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.049

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21790051, 21790050, 21771187, 21701182]
  2. Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. Frontier Science Research Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-JSC052]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (China) for Distinguished Young Scholars [JQ201610]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Existing methodological strategies for the doping of nitrogen (N) atoms in carbon materials usually contain more than one species with indefinite N content, which made it difficult to study the role of each type of N atoms played duing the doping and severely restrict the wide application. Herein, we reported a developed synthetic strategy for preparing carbonous materials contained with specific N atoms. The well-defined carbonous network triazine-graphdiyne (TA-GDY), which comprising merely one type of N atoms with fixed amount, has been prepared through bottom-up way with triethynyltriazine as the starting molecule. TA-GDY is an unique two-dimensional (2D) carbonous material, including sp- and sp(2)-hybridized carbon atoms, as well as quantitative pyridine-like sp2-hybridized N atoms. All the N atoms are placed on the plane of the carbon skeleton, and the high N content provides plenty of active heteroatom sites decorated uniformly in the hexagonal honeycomb-like pores. Based on theoretical prediction, the wide interlayer spacing and large amount of pyridinic-N as well as uniform honeycomb-like pores are favorable for Li-ion storage and diffusion. As expected, the TA-GDY-based electrodes exhibit outstanding Li-ion storage performance, such as superior rate capability, larger capacity, and excellent stability. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据