4.7 Article

Amino acids modified konjac glucomannan as green corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in HCl solution

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 191-199

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.069

关键词

Adsorption; Corrosion inhibition; Mild steel; Electrochemical technique; Konjac glucomannan

资金

  1. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2015BAB08B00]
  2. Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20160983]
  3. National Key R D Plan [2017YFC0404100]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21605084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Konjac glucomannan (KGM) was modified with amino acids to synthesize polysaccharide esters (KGMA and KGMH) which were evaluated as corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in 0.5 M HCl solution by weight loss tests, Tafel curves, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The synthetic polymers were found to have the lower water absorbency and the higher water solubility than KGM. Gravimetric measurements showed the maximum efficiencies of KGMA and KGMH for decreasing the corrosion rate of metal at 2000 ppm are up to 89.9% and 92.4%, respectively. Polarization curves indicated polysaccharide esters could retard both hydrogen evolution reaction and metal dissolution reaction and that the inhibitory effect was concentration dependent. Besides, EIS studies demonstrated the corrosion resistance of mild steel in hydrochloric acid was enhanced by polymer additives. The observations on mild steel surface by SEM suggested the metallic substrate obtained good protection against corrosion in inhibitor-containing HCl solution. The adsorptive behavior of polymer molecules including physisorption and chemisorption obeyed Langmuir isotherm and UV-vis spectra revealed the formation of inhibitor-ion complex. The better performance of KGMH on corrosion inhibition was attributed to the easier transfer of p-electron or n-electron, which was confirmed by quantum chemical calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据